Welcome back to the prehistoric safari service; this time you're witnessing the scene from south east of the North America about 8 million years ago.
The Miocene was simply the era of big bad carnivores: a numerous formidable meat eaters occupied large areas of the earth, competing day and night for their limited prey resources and for the top predator spot. This severe competitive environment was considered by some scientists as one of very factors that would lead to 'accentuation' of the so called 'sabertoothed cat morphology' : hypertrophied upper canines, wider mouth gaping ability and highly power oriented body designs that make rapid killing of large cumbersome preys possible by way of slashing bite method(sabertoothed predators itself already existed well before the Miocene in Nimravidae though!).
Genus Barbourofelis from the family Barbourofelidae seems to be the product of this tough era, sometimes regarded as the pinnacle of the morphological evolution toward power oriented big game hunting, even more so than the later machairodont phenom, Smilodon. The largest of this genus is said to have possessed longer saber canines, superior weaponry and grappling strength even than the largest Smilodon and should naturally be put as one of the most formidable among cat-like creatures and sabertooths.
From front to back: >Hornless rhino (Teleoceras fossiger) One of small to medium sized early rhinos which lacked horns.
>American proto scimitar cat (Nimravides / Machairodus catacopis) This lion sized early machairodont was probably the same species as Eurasia's Machairodus aphanistus, marked by the primitive trait of a very long back, proportionally longer even than in most of felines not to mention later sabertooths.
>Middle sized American Bear dog (Amphicyon sp.) The family Amphicyonidae is often called colloquially as 'bear dogs' because of their intriguing morphologies that are almost intermediate between Ursidae and Canidae plus very long back & tail(don't mistake them with 'hemicyon bears' whose nickname is 'half dogs' yet in fact are placed within the true bear family!). Some species of this great family evolved into semi-plantigrate posture and became gigantic (A.giganteus in Europe for instance) while others acquired surprisingly canid-like shapes, bone crashing dentition and digitigrate posture.
>Giant Bonecracker dog (Epicyon haydeni) By far the largest canid ever existed, probably weighing up to more than 300 lbs in extreme cases. As with most of other hyper-carnivorous borophagine dogs, their massive premolars were well adapted to bone crashing.
>Slingshot beast (Synthetoceras tricornatus) This rather big, unique harbivore possessed literally 'Y' shaped long appendage on the tip of its upper jaw and thus the english nickname 'slingshot'.
>Humpless camel (Aepicamelus major) A very tall yet slender early camel of the North America with no visible humps.
>Shovel tusked elephant (Amebelodon sp.) There were several variations in so called 'shovel tasker' gomphotherids but in all cases, both upper and lower jaw bones protruded and lower tasks formed conspicuous shovel shape.
This is a great image, though a little cluttered. That's not to say your technical skill isn't amazing, and I love how you drew the fur on the animals. The poses also struck me as good, especially the Amphicyon to the left, it has a wonderful lanky wolfness. Other than that, it just looks like you could have gone heavier in your coloring around the animals, they look like the have halos around their bodies from the thumbnail.
Thanks a lot for your interest in this image. The flash-like effects around the animals on the smaller image is the thing that I have noticed for sometime too. How about on the larger(original size) image, are they still conspicuous to you? The reason for its being a bit clutter is because I wanted to depict each animals as detailed as possible,(meaning I had to draw each of them relatively big) while I had to use only an A4 sized paper for that, because of my small scanner. I tryed my best in these circumstances.
The flash doesn't look as obvious on the larger image, but you can still see it if you tried. I don't know if you were commissioned or anything for this, but the image could less cluttered with a wider rectangular format, and less animals in the foreground. Maybe just a few for each piece, perhaps. These types of images that could be used for an encyclopedia of prehistoric animals always strike me as unrealistic to have that many animals in one small area, but to each his own.
I guress I should have painted background colors fully right up to each edges of animals, rather than to leave thin spaces around them, in order to eliminate the flash effect. I actually agree with your thoughts on most of these reconstructions that they tend to look unnaturally crowded. Well, matters of composition, the size of paper, spaces... are all something that I should seek improvements in the future. Thanks for your honest opinions.
Thank you everyone, I'm a bit busy now but I will reply, edit colors a bit and add some more descriptions to the image later. Thanks again for your interest and support!
The flash-like effects around the animals on the smaller image is the thing that I have noticed for sometime too. How about on the larger(original size) image, are they still conspicuous to you?
The reason for its being a bit clutter is because I wanted to depict each animals as detailed as possible,(meaning I had to draw each of them relatively big) while I had to use only an A4 sized paper for that, because of my small scanner. I tryed my best in these circumstances.
I actually agree with your thoughts on most of these reconstructions that they tend to look unnaturally crowded.
Well, matters of composition, the size of paper, spaces... are all something that I should seek improvements in the future.
Thanks for your honest opinions.